Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 19, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

Inmate Bobby Rowland appeals from the dismissal of his petition by the Chancery Court of Davidson County. The appellant alleged that the application of Department of Correction rules to increase the proportion of his sentence that must be served before he is eligible for parole is a violation of his constitutional rights.

The Chancery Court dismissed his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We believe that the Court was correct in dismissing Mr. Rowland’s claim, but feel that the more appropriate ground for dismissal is failure to state a claim upon which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner of Correction and Chairman of Board of Pardons and ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ogburn v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Taylor v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Charles E. Greer v. Correction Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  4. Charles Rooker v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. David Britt v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API