Wilhorn Builders, Inc. v. Cortaro Manangement Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
Both appellant and appellee (hereinafter referred to as buyer and seller respectively) have filed motions for rehearing or for modification of the decision of this court. The motions for rehearings are denied. All material issues were decided in the original opinion that could have been determined and the cause was remanded to the trial court for it, upon a new trial, to decide the issues we are now called upon to decide. Counsel for buyer expressly urged in its briefs that the cause be remanded for trial on the original complaint in the event we reached the conclusion that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peterson v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Marshall v. PatzmanArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Babbitt Bros. Trading Co. v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Fiat Motor Co. v. North Broad Street Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Autonumerics, Inc. v. Bayer Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Earven v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Deuel v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Williams v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Monroe Street Properties, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Orville S. Carpenter, Trustee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.