Legal Opinion

City of Winchester v. VanMeter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 17, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The only question in this case is, was the appellee, VanMeter, in April, 1912, a resident of the city of Winchester in the sense that his money, choses in action, and personal property were taxable in the city as of that date?

The lower court ruled that he was not, and the city appeals.

The evidence shows, without contradiction, that Van-Meter, in April, 1912, and for many years prior thereto, owned and conducted a large farm in Clark county, a few miles distant from Winchester. His farm had never been leased or rented, but was managed and operated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Lebanon v. BiggersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Graves' Administrator v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Helm's Trustee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Montgomery v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Burr's Administrator v. HatterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Johnson v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Saunders v. City of FlemingsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API