Estate of Nunez by and through Nunez v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
This is one of those unusual cases. Here, the Court is satisfied that the evidence proffered by Plaintiffs is newly discovered and could not reasonably have been discovered earlier. CPMG does not argue otherwise. Indeed, Plaintiffs properly requested the late-produced evidence, which was both discoverable and inadvertently withheld until after the Court issued its summary judgment order. The record reflects that Plaintiffs relied upon CPMG's discovery responses that all such evidence had been produced. Thus, the Court cannot find that Plaintiffs reasonably could have known of the evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donovan v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Sandoval v. San Diego, County ofDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023