Legal Opinion

Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

The application for permission to appeal was granted to review the holding of the Court of Appeals that Federal Express Corporation was not a “public utility” within the definition set forth in T.C.A. § 67-5-501(8), and the concomittant holding that personal property of Federal Express was to be assessed at the 30% commercial and industrial rate rather than the 55% public utility rate.

In 1979, the tax period in question, Federal operated an interstate door-to-door package delivery service, mainly using its own integrated air-ground transportation system of some 80 to 90…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Jackson Architectural Iron Works v. HurlbutNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Tennessee Growers, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Oliver v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Tax Appeal of ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Williams Natural Gas Co. v. . State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. J. Harold Shankle Co. v. Bedford Co. Bd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Retail Direct, LLC v. Payano Express, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API