In re Estate of Hiley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
This appeal deals with dower questions. The County Judge’s Court ruled that the widow was entitled to dower. The administrator appeals. We affirm.
The general background recitals are unnecessary as a basis for our decision.
The administrator’s Point I as to an evi-dentiary ruling reveals at very best only harmless error and does not merit discussion.
The administrator’s Point II will be broken into two parts and re-phrased:
1. Does the death of the widow after she officially elects to take dower and before same was perfected and accomplished by the actual selection and assignment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seaton v. SeatonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- In Re Estate of PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Bibb v. BickfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Bomar v. WilkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Florida National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smail v. HutchinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- In Re Estate of CardiniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- In re the Estate of BilseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- In re Estate of TenerelliCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988