State v. Bettencourt
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court for oral argument on November 8, 2000, pursuant to an order that directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time.
This case is now before us for the second time. The case initially came before us on December 8, 1998, following defendant’s conviction for second-degree…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- State v. LemosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
4Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- State v. PageSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Tempest v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016