Denny v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*504OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
The appeals are from convictions in a joint trial for possessing marihuana. The punishment assessed by the court, after a finding of guilt by the jury, was four years probated for each appellant.
The indictment alleged that William L. Wooten and these appellants, Denny and Forfar, possessed marihuana. Only Denny and Forfar have appealed. The record does not show what punishment, if any, was assessed against Wooten.
The State’s evidence reflects that officers stopped an automobile driven by Wooten in which Denny and Forfar were riding and found 2.29 grams of marihuana…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Culmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Vavra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Scelles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Beeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Laws v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Arnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.