Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1931No. 6270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Appellee, as complainant, obtained a decree enjoining “the defendant Riley, his agents and employees,” from collecting, coercing, or compelling payment of taxes levied and assessed upon school lands of the state held by the appellee under a contract of purchase, and enjoining other defendants from assessing or levying taxes on-the said land, and defendant Babbitt from making or asserting any forfeiture or termination of the right to purchase the land, prior to issuance of patent by the state, for default in payment of taxes assessed against and levied upon the said…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Judith Basin Land Co. v. Fergus CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Seafirst Corp. v. Dept. of RevenueArizona Tax Court · 1992
  4. Board of Equalization v. Heights Real Estate Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In re General Adjudication of all Rights to use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API