Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Crumpton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 1913No. 8445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by J. B. Burgess against W. D. Crumpton. Defendant appealed.

1Per curiam

1 Upon (the call of this case for hearing in this Court, it was made to appear to the Court that'after the appeal had been taken and perfected and the record printed for the hearing of the appeal, and while the appeal was pending in this Court, but before it was heard, the defendant, who- was appellant, made a motion- in the Circuit Court to vacate the judgment appealed from and grant a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence; that his motion was granted, and that the new trial was had, and resulted in a judgment for the defendant, from which no appeal has been taken. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hecht & Co. v. FrieslebenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  2. Cooke v. PooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. ZAHLER ET UX.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Franks v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S. S. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API