Legal Opinion

United States v. Stepanets

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 12, 2018No. 16-2402PPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

Preface

The government appeals from orders dismissing counts in an indictment that charged Alla Stepanets, Kathy Chin, and Michelle Thomas with “dispensing]” mis-branded drugs in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 353(b)(1), 331(a), and 333(a)(2)— a statute that often goes by the unpronounceable initialism “FFDCA.” Reviewing the matter de novo, see United States v. Guerrier, 669 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2011), we think dismissal was not called for. And so we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FFDCA Primer

Here is what you need to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Reyes-ValdiviaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Vega-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. SvirskiyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. StepanetsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API