Moore v. Lindsay
New York Supreme Court
Action to foreclose a mortgage for nonpayment of interest.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
The defense of usury is interposed to the plaintiff’s action of foreclosure of a mortgage upon the defendant’s real property, based upon plaintiff’s alleged exaction, when the mortgage loan was closed, of the sum of thirty dollars, the amount of the tax paid to the register of the county of ¡New York upon recording the mortgage. Defendant also claims that the complaint does not state a cause of action in that it omits affirmatively to allege payment of the mortgage recording tax. The latter contention is without merit. The complaint states a complete cause of action. The cause of action is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clarke v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Guggenheimer v. . GeiszlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Eaton v. AlgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Roche v. St. John's Riverside HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Moore v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909