Legal Opinion · Dissent

Youngblood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 7, 2009No. CR-08-0846Published

1DissentWelch, Judge

I disagree with the majority’s opinion remanding this case to the trial court. A remand is unnecessary here because the case can be, and should be, resolved based solely on the record before this Court. The trial court’s judgment denying Young-blood’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea should be affirmed.

During Youngblood’s jury trial on one count of first-degree sodomy, two counts of child abuse, and two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, he entered pleas of guilty to the two counts of first-degree sexual abuse and the remaining charges were dismissed. Before sentencing, Youngblood filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stallings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Tubbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Vinnie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API