Legal Opinion
E. C. Porter & Co. v. Loeb
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 28, 1906Published
Appeal from Houston Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. IT. A. Pearce. Action by Porter & Co. v. Loeb. The facts on which the opinion was rested sufficiently appear therein. Counsel discussed matter raised by assignment of errors, but does not discuss the point on which the case is determined. The court cannot consider the hill of exceptions for any purpose.- — Zion r. Folleos, 182 Ala. 609; Crawford v. Cra,u> ford, 119 Ala. 84; Jasper r. O'Roar, 112 Ala. 247.
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
On the 14th of November, 1905, in term time, as the hill of exceptions shows, “the presiding judge made and entered upon the record of said circuit court, the following order, to-wit:
*519“ ‘Plaintiff allowed until January 1st, 1906, to present and have signed their hill of exceptions in this case.
“ ‘November 14th, 1905.
“ ‘II. A. Pearce,
“ ‘Judge 12th Circuit Presiding/
“Wherefore, within the time covered by said order, the plaintiffs in this case, presented this and pray that the same be taken and accepted as their bill of exceptions, upon the same being signed, according to law, by his honor Henry…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dantzler & Sons v. Swift Creek Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Peterman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Zion Fountain Lodge v. FolkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Samuel v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902