Sodini v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCall, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Fritz Sodmi. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff in error was indicted, jointly with one Petty, on a charge of carrying on the business of retail liquor dealer *914without having paid the special tax required by law. This writ is brought to review the judgment entered upon conviction.
On careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of counsel, we are of opinion that there was ample testimony to sustain the conviction, and that the motion for directed verdict was thus properly denied. There was substantial testimony tending to show that plaintiif in error, either alone or in association with another, owned a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Conyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.