Legal Opinion

MURPHY v. FREEMAN Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 26, 2016No. A16A0423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mercier, Judge.

Nancy Murphy (Murphy) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and its order barring the parties and their counsel from directly contacting the trial court’s court reporter. Murphy argues that the trial court erred in granting Nan Freeman’s motion for summary judgment because issues of material fact remained, and that the trial court’s order barring either party from directly contacting its court reporter was in violation of numerous constitutional and statutory rights. Finding no error, we affirm.

“A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. J. Kinson Cook of Georgia, Inc. v. Heery/MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. EZ Green Associates, LLC v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Hardwick v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Oglethorpe Power Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. In the Matter of Millard C. Farmer, JrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. MARVALYNE ARNOLD v. FAIRWAY MANAGEMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  4. Siteone Landscape Supply, LLC v. Larry StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API