Legal Opinion

Crane v. Commissioner of Public Welfare

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

In the case of Ingerson v. Pratt, No. 76-3255-S (D. Mass. Sept. 17, 1981), a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts declared that the Department of Public Welfare (department) violated Federal law by promulgating and enforcing a regulation requiring the deduction of Federal energy assistance benefits in computing entitlements to emergency assistance benefits. The judge enjoined the State defendants from continuing that practice. However, due to constraints imposed by the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the judge did not order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Dawson v. BirenbaumKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Tatar v. SchukerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API