Legal Opinion

Cox v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

. Pleadings. Amendment. Actions. Negligence-Verdict. Before Judge Harden. ' City court of Savannah. May term, 1888. Reported, in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Murphy sued Cox for damages. In his original declaration he alleged, in substance, as follows : On the streets of Savannah he was attacked by a wild and ferocious steer, the property of S. II. Zoucks and D. Cox, or one of them; that it was in the possession of Cox’s servants; that the defendants knew that the animal was ferocious and dangerous and had a propensity for attacking persons, but that they attempted to drive it through the public streets of Savannah. The declaration then shows how the plaintiff was injured and damaged. The plaintiff amended his declaration by…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Towaliga Falls Power Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Connell v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. O'Neill v. BlaseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API