Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Chitty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1928No. 20698. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff as trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a deed to block 4 of Galliher’s Addition to Olympia- and to compel the transfer of this property to the plaintiff. The cause came on for trial before the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, upon motion of the defendants, a judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which the plaintiff appeals.

To an understanding of the controversy, it will be necessary to detail the title of block 4 from the time it left John R. Dodge and wife until it was conveyed to Fred Chitty. August…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKay v. Sperry Flour Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. LusterWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Charles Arnold and Chicken-Eggs, Inc. v. Cleo P. King, Trustee in Bankruptcy of James C. Bookey, Sr., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. SEATTLE ASS'N OF CR. MEN v. LusterWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API