Legal Opinion

State v. . Carter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for larceny, tried before Boykin, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1893, of Davie Superior Court. Defendant was convicted, and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Clauk, J.:

The case on appeal states that there were no exceptions to the admission or refusal of testimony, nor to the charge, and that no special instructions were asked. The judgment must be affirmed, unless there is error upon the face of the record proper. State v. Bell, 103 N. C., 438, and other cases cited in Clark’s Code (2d Ed.), p. 582.

The defendant was indicted for larceny, with a second count for receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen. There was a general verdict of guilty without specifying upon which count. The Code, §1191, permits the joining of the two counts,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. State v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  4. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. State v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MeshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. . PoythressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API