Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Kristofer Hugunin
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pyle, Judge.
Statement of the Case
In this interlocutory appeal, the Indiana Department of Workforce Development. (“Workforce Development”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment in its action against Kristofer Hugunin (“Hugunin”). 1 Concluding that Workforce Development is enti-tied, to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to grant Workforce Development’s summary judgment motion.
We reverse and remand with instructions.
Issue
The sole issue for our review is whether trial court erred in denying Workforce…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Stacy Knighten v. East Chicago Housing Authority, Individually and d/b/a West Calumet Complex, Davis Security Service, LLC, and Donnell CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- J.M. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and T.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.