Legal Opinion

Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Kristofer Hugunin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 64A05-1703-CC-583Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pyle, Judge.

Statement of the Case

In this interlocutory appeal, the Indiana Department of Workforce Development. (“Workforce Development”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment in its action against Kristofer Hugunin (“Hugunin”). 1 Concluding that Workforce Development is enti-tied, to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to grant Workforce Development’s summary judgment motion.

We reverse and remand with instructions.

Issue

The sole issue for our review is whether trial court erred in denying Workforce…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Stacy Knighten v. East Chicago Housing Authority, Individually and d/b/a West Calumet Complex, Davis Security Service, LLC, and Donnell CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ball Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. J.M. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and T.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API