Clay v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of perjury, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
Appellant’s first ground of his motion for a new trial is, that the court erred in failing to define to the jury the meaning of the term “deliberately.” The court did tell the jury, however, that if they found from the evidence that he made through inadvertence or under agitation or by mistake the statement upon which the perjury is predicated, to find him not guilty. Furthermore, the charge says a false statement made through inadvertence or under agitation or by mistake…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Bowles v. JungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.