Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1981No. 61126PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellants Ronald and Dean Williams were indicted on two counts of failing to pay for agricultural products. A directed verdict was entered in favor of Dean Williams on one of the counts, but the jury returned a verdict of guilty against her on the remaining count and against Ronald Williams on both counts. Appellants enumerate as error the trial court’s charge as to “parties to a crime” and its rulings on venue, on admitting testimony regarding allegedly similar offenses committed by appellants, and on the sufficiency of the evidence as to intent. We find no error and affirm.

1.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Fishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Garmon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Mallette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Blocker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McMahon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Schwerdtfeger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Parish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Engel v. BourbeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. McMahon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API