Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of Blackmore

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 18, 2002No. 86,177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Michael Blackmore appeals the trial court’s determination that he is a sexually violent predator in violation of K.S.A. 59-29a01 et seq. Blackmore challenges the jurisdiction of the trial court and the sufficiency of the ruling.

The facts are not in dispute. On April 13, 2000, the attorney general filed a petition seeking to have Blackmore declared a sexually violent predator. On April 28, 2000, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 59-29a05 and found there was probable cause to believe Blackmore was a sexually violent predator. A journal entry was filed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Thompson v. AmisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Care & Treatment of HuntCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  2. Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. In Re Care & Treatment of SearcySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API