Legal Opinion

Edward Swartz, Inc. v. Saunders

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. The judge rightly declined to direct a verdict for the defendants in this action for a broker’s commission, which, on the evidence, could have been found due notwithstanding no sale was made. McKallagat v. LaCognata, 335 Mass. 376, 378, and cases cited. The testimony of the plaintiff's treasurer that he was “to ‘get’ (meaning ‘paid’ as opposed to ‘earned’)” the commission “when papers passed” and that he could not answer “yes” or “no” as to whether he was “entitled to a commission in any sale until such papers were passed” went only to the weight of his other testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeFreitas v. CoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Rosenthal v. SchwartzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Spence v. LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. McKallagat v. LaCOGNATAMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Lord v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API