Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Yarbough

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 15, 1990No. NMCM 89 0295CPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStrickland, Judge

I agree with the majority’s analysis concerning the admissibility of Prosecution Exhibit 1 and their conclusion that it was prima facie admissible in this case. However, I disagree with the finding of the majority that there was no ineffective assistance of counsel.

The majority concede that the trial defense counsel had persuasive matters to argue against the admissibility of the nonjudicial punishment for cocaine use. Nevertheless, they conclude that neither the failure to object on the basis of these matters, nor the failure even to present evidence of nonfinality, constituted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. PageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API