Glass v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Logan Circuit Court. Jephtha H. Evans, Judge. The second instruction was abstract and misleading. The sale was completed when the goods were set apart, addressed to Rawlings, and delivered to the earner. 43 Ark. 356; 1 Benj. Sales, 130-514; 71 Ala. 358, 360, 368. Appellant was entitled to instructions fairly presenting his defenses to the jury. 3 S. W. 717; 20 Tex. App. 13; 4 S. W. 22.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The appellant was indicted and convicted in the Logan circuit court for selling liquor without license, andi appeals to this court.
The proof showed that one Rawlings ordered a jug of liquor from one Odom, a liquor dealer at Huntington, in Sebastian county. Rawlings lived at Booneville in Logan county. He ordered the liquor through Glass, the appellant, who lived at Booneville, and who was the agent of Odom to solicit orders for the sale of liquor, receiving a regular salary for such services. Glass sent in the order to Odom at Huntington. Odom put a jug of liquor, sealed, tagged and addressed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Carl & TobeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Yowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922