Legal Opinion

Florida Team Tennis, Inc. v. World Team Tennis, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 75-812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

This is a diversity suit between a Pennsylvania corporation having its principal place of business in Florida, and a California corporation presently maintaining it principal office in the State of California. The defendant is not registered to do business in Pennsylvania and service on the defendant was made under the provisions of the Pennsylvania “Long-Arm” Statute, 42 P.S. 8302 and 8307.

The defendant moves to dismiss this complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction for the reason that it is not and was not doing business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Worthy Siders, Sr. v. Upper Mississippi Towing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Donald L. Atkins v. Schmutz Manufacturing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Glen Knit Industries, Ltd. v. E. F. Timme & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Damon Coats, Inc. v. Munsingwear, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Drysdale v. Florida Team Tennis, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API