Legal Opinion
Howell v. Karl Koch Erecting Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.
Defendant and third-party plaintiff Karl Koch Erecting Corp. *492(hereinafter referred to as Karl Koch) moved for an order granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.
Facts:
The following facts are alleged by plaintiff Jeffrey Howell in his May 4, 1999 examination before trial.
At around 1:00 p.m., on February 2, 1996, Howell allegedly slipped and fell on a crane deck and sustained injuries. Howell is licensed in New York City and New York State as a hoisting machine operator. At the time of the incident, he was employed by third-party…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Locicero v. Princeton Restoration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Field v. New York UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2003