Legal Opinion

Boulevard Apts. v. BOR. OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 29, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

111 N.J. Super. 408 (1970)

268 A.2d 359

BOULEVARD APARTMENTS, INC. AND SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC., BOTH CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided July 29, 1970.

Mr. Benedict Krieger, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, Attorneys for Defendant.

TOSCANO, J.C.C.

On March 11, 1969, the Hasbrouck Heights Borough Council adopted Ordinance No. 962 which purports to regulate and license, among others, multiple family dwellings,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bellington v. Township of East WindsorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Midland Carpet Corp. v. Franklin Associated PropertiesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Gross v. AllanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Mogolefsky v. SchoemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. CINNAMINSON MOTEL v. Cinnaminson Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Trailways, Inc. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API