Legal Opinion

Buford v. Speed

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 28, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 21 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Halleck .on Laws of War, 357. Confiscation Act of Congress of 1862. Clancy on Husband and Wife, pp. 359, 360, 361. 3 Kent, 36. 5 J. J. Mar. 230, Long’s adm’r v. White’s adm’r. 10 B. Mon. 322, Coleman v. Wooley. 13 B. Mon. 383, Bill & Terry v. Kellar. .11 Wall. 306, Miller v. United States.

Read the full summary

Case 21 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Halleck .on Laws of War, 357. Confiscation Act of Congress of 1862. Clancy on Husband and Wife, pp. 359, 360, 361. 3 Kent, 36. 5 J. J. Mar. 230, Long’s adm’r v. White’s adm’r. 10 B. Mon. 322, Coleman v. Wooley. 13 B. Mon. 383, Bill & Terry v. Kellar. .11 Wall. 306, Miller v. United States. CITED Story on Agency, secs. 118, 141, 19S, 194, 237, 250. Douglas’s Paley on Agency, 171. 7 Cranch, 603, Fairfax’s devisee v. Hunter’s lessee. 3Wheat. 594, Craig v. Radford. 9 Wall. 72, United States v. Grossmayer.’ 3 Phillimore on…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE COFER

delivered the opibion oe the court.

In the year 1862 the appellant Buford was the owner of a large and very valuable farm situated in Woodford County, on which he then resided with his family, consisting of his wife' and only child, then a minor. In the fall of that year he left his wife and child residing on the farm and entered the Confederate army, and remained absent from home until the close of the war in 1865.

Some time in 1863 Mrs. Buford and the friends of herself and her husband became apprehensive that his estate would be libeled for condemnation under the act of congress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Montgomery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Crutcher v. HordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  5. Roach v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rau v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Allen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Mayer v. GarvanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API