State v. Gay
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSandstrom, Justice
[¶ 27] At the intersection of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the majority follows the district court in making a wrong turn. I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 28] The district court suppressed the defendant’s statement because he was kept in handcuffs for fifteen minutes, including time after he had been frisked for weapons. I would reverse and remand because the actions of law enforcement were reasonable and the district court misapplied the law. There is no evidence that the handcuffs in any way coerced the defendant into incriminating himself. Even though the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Donald Wesley Taylor, United States of America v. Steven Wayne Pressler, and Donald Wesley TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Arthur Ronald Crittendon A/K/A Jabbar Muwakkil RagibCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Donald Lee KappermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ginger A. Miller, United States of America v. Toni A. Hampton, United States of America v. Jay L. NashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.