Chalmers Motor Car Co. v. Midland Motors Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
An attachment was issued in an action by the plaintiff against the defendant upon the ground of an actual and intended disposition of its property to delay and defraud creditors. Upon motion *305of the defendant the attachment was vacated. The plaintiff appeals.
The defendant was engaged in the automobile business and for some years was the northwestern distributing agent of the plaintiff and had established a large business. It seems to have had good credit. In the latter part of 1921 its agency was canceled. It then advertised for sale its automobiles on hand, including the Chalmers cars, at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clarke & Simmons, Inc. v. RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Hurni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920