Legal Opinion

Beach v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1990No. 89-1484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse Joseph Beach’s sentence because it was based on sentencing guidelines calculations under Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that included three misdemeanor convictions that appellant contends were obtained without counsel or a knowing waiver of the right to counsel. We hold that his affidavit was sufficient to place these facts in issue and require the state to bear the burden of showing the contrary. State v. Troehler, 546 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Smith v. State, 498 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Accordingly, we remand for resen-tencing with leave to give the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. TroehlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Oldacre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Rock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Beach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API