Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Aetna Insurance Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1973No. 7135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge:

After the trial court awarded appellant Amasie E. Coleman an ex parte $18,000 judgment against Felix Randolph Aiken and Aiken Transport, Inc., defendants to the complaint, a writ of attachment was filed against credits of the defendants in the hands of appellee Aetna Insurance Co. (Aetna-garnishee), their insurer. Upon a traverse to Aetna’s response to the attachment, and after further discovery, there was a trial by the court which resulted in a judgment in Aetna’s favor. We affirm.

From the record it appears that appellant had, in October 1970, sued Aiken and his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freas v. GitomerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Thomas v. OtisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. James Thomas and Eunice Thomas PadgettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GregorieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Ehab Asal v. Estate of MinaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Lexicon Title Services, LLC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GregorieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API