Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Teel

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action for deceit arising out of the conveyance by the plaintiff to the defendant of an equity in certain real estate belonging to the plaintiff in exchange for certain stock belonging to the defendant. The stock transferred by the defendant to the plaintiff was stock in the Van Choate Electric Light and Car Company, a defunct concern whose stock was worthless. The alleged deceit was that the stock was represented as stock of the Van Choate Electric Company whose works were located at Foxborough. This stock had a market value of $10 a share. The number of shares to be exchanged was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Weeks v. CurrierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horton v. TyreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Long v. Inhabitants of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Gurney v. TenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Rollins v. QuimbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API