Legal Opinion

Grady v. Electric Bond and Share Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 25, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

suggestion filed a Rule nisi in Prohibition was issued and the defendants have moved to quash the rule.

The Electric Bond and Share Company, a corporation, and others plaintiffs in this Prohibition proceeding, seek to have the Circuit Court prohibited from proceeding further in a stated cause of action, in which the plaintiffs' here are defendants, upon the ground that the service of process upon Electric Bond and Share Company, a corporation, one of the defendants in said action, as shown by the return on such process, is insufficient to give the trial court juris diction of such defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drew Lumber Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Milton Land & Investment Co. v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. LuffmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. Seacoast Lumber Co. v. R. J. & B. F. Camp Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
  5. Ex Parte: Foy GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Outdoor Media, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. National Organization Masters, Mates and Pilots of America, Inc. v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Imperial Towers, Inc. v. Dade Home Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Brandt v. ShaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Emery Worldwide, Inc. v. Indemnity Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API