Ladshaw v. Hoskins
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Baker
delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:
This action was for the ejectment of the tenant of a nine-room house at No. 121 Alabama Street, City of Spartanburg, which house was occupied by Mrs. Curtis Hoskins, her infant child, and her mother-in-law, Mrs. Maude Hos-kins, as a home, and six of the rooms were rented to variout people, so the house was predominantly a commercial enterprise.
Mrs. Curtis Hoskins is the wife of a soldier, and she and her husband lived there in the beginning as roomers, sub-renting from Mr. and Mrs. A. E. Brackens who were then the tenants. At that time Mr. Hoskins…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stephens v. RinglingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Thompson v. Queen City Coach Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Lee v. StorferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Black v. Town of SpringfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Gibbs v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963