Legal Opinion

Ladshaw v. Hoskins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 1944No. 15630PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Baker

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:

This action was for the ejectment of the tenant of a nine-room house at No. 121 Alabama Street, City of Spartanburg, which house was occupied by Mrs. Curtis Hoskins, her infant child, and her mother-in-law, Mrs. Maude Hos-kins, as a home, and six of the rooms were rented to variout people, so the house was predominantly a commercial enterprise.

Mrs. Curtis Hoskins is the wife of a soldier, and she and her husband lived there in the beginning as roomers, sub-renting from Mr. and Mrs. A. E. Brackens who were then the tenants. At that time Mr. Hoskins…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. RinglingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Thompson v. Queen City Coach Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Lee v. StorferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Black v. Town of SpringfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Gibbs v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API