Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Yeazell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal: Court of Appeals for Clark county..

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

This cause was originally one for the partition of the lands of which Nathan Nicholson died seized.

The final issue for determination relates to the interest of Nathan R. Nicholson and. Maud N. Gest, children of Lemuel Nicholson, deceased.

Nathan Nicholson died intestate seized of the real estate sought to be partitioned, leaving brothers and sisters and their representatives as next of kin.

Nathan R. Nicholson and Maud N. Gest, as representatives of Lemuel Nicholson, took by descent the legal title to one-eighth part thereof, unless such right is barred or defeated by the undisputed facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. KershawIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Kinyon v. KinyonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kay Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  2. Marathon Targets, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. United States v. George Williams, Jr., United States of America v. Rosa L. Sumpter, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Lussia Rein, United States of America v. James A. Lincoln, United States of America v. Mary L. Lincoln, United States of America v. Michele E. Lincoln, United States of America v. Albert Lincoln, United States of America v. Norris Dubose, United States of America v. Thelma DuboseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API