Legal Opinion

State v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1987No. C 7407; CA A43882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant was charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s pretrial motion to exclude evidence of the Intoxilyzer test results on the basis that the administering officer failed to “complete” the operator’s checklist as required by ORS 813.160 and OAR 257-30-020(l)(a). 1 The only question before us is whether the officer’s failure to mark one of the nine boxes appearing on the checklist renders the test result inadmissible in a subsequent prosecution. We hold that it does not. Accordingly, we reverse.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. RoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. HemkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API