Legal Opinion

Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Plaintiff sues for a declaratory judgment declaring that plaintiff was not, and is not, liable to a utility tax under the utility tax laws of the city of New York. In addition, recovery is sought of certain sums, representing utility taxes paid "by plaintiff to the defendants under protest.

The amended complaint alleges that the business of plaintiff is that of the protection of its customers’ premises against burglary and unauthorized entry. The customers in each case enter into a contract with plaintiff. Protection is afforded the customers "by the maintenance of forces of watchmen,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Booth v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Booth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API