Legal Opinion

Little v. T. G. Quinn & Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided May 15, 1871Published

Error to General Term by Otis B. Little to a judgment rendered against him and others. The case appears fully in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHagans, J.

It was claimed that Otis B. Little, William Capson, and Robert Carson, partners as Little, Carson & Co., are indebted to ,the defendants in error in the sum of $1,500 and interest upon a promissory note for $3,000, dated November 1, 1868, payable two months after date, at Kinney & Co.’s bank, to the order of the defendants in error. The note'is credited with $1,500. It is agreed that *380Little, Carson & Co. gave Quinn & Co. this note as a collateral security, so-called in the pleadings, for their accommodation note, dated November 4, 1868, of like tenor and amount, to be used in the business of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. WaylandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API