Legal Opinion

Vento v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Joseph T. Gural and Iris Gural appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated March 12, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as as*310serted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garvin v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Fontana v. FortunoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Miller v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nieves v. ISS Cleaning Services Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Martin v. W.B. Restaurant Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. McGuire v. QuinnonezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Semerjian v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API