Legal Opinion

Mancuso v. Levitt

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alice Schlesinger, J.

In this action plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of Civil Service Law §§ 50-a and 50 (7).

*254In 1986 the Legislature amended the Civil Service Law by enacting section 50-a which sets up a review procedure in New York City for challenging key answers to civil service examinations. The legislation permits candidates to file written protests to the proposed answer key before the Test Validation Board (TVB). A final answer key is issued after taking into consideration the protests.

Section 50 (7) limits court review to the question of whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Deas v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Acosta v. LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mancuso v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API