Legal Opinion

State v. Oleksy

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided May 23, 1912No. 43Published

Indictment for “selling intoxicating liquor without license” Motion to quash indictment because it did not plainly and fully inform the defendants of the nature and cause of the accusation against them in accordance with the provisions of Section 7, of Article 1, of the Constitution of the State of Delaware. The indictment is set out in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Rice, J.,

delivering the opinion of thé court:

The grand jury of this county, at the present term, indicted Antonio Oleksy and Joseph Helenski for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, the indictment being as follows:

“That Antonio Oleksy and Joseph Helenski, both late of Wilmington Hundred, in the county aforesaid, on the third day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and twelve, with force and arms, at Wilmington Hundred in the county aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully sell intoxicating liquor, to wit, lager beer, to one Felix Lewandowski, against the form of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PolkNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1907
  2. State v. FaganNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1909
  3. State v. SolioNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API