Legal Opinion

State v. Casal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 23, 1984No. 12657-1-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C.J.

James R. Casal appeals his conviction of violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, following a bench trial on stipulated facts. He claims that, at the pretrial suppression hearing, the court erred by not requiring the State to produce the confidential informant upon whose observations the search warrant was issued. We find no error and affirm.

On April 20, 1982 at approximately 11 a.m., detectives of the Seattle Narcotics Unit executed a search warrant at Casal's residence. The warrant was based upon a police detective's affidavit stating that a reliable confidential informant had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Larry Dean KiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CasalWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API