Burns v. . Tomlinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
AotioN tried before Webb, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1907, of ANSow. Plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
ClaRK, O. J.
Tlie plaintiff seeks to recover $1,920 paid by bim to Robert Moore & Oo., of New York, “on 100 bales of cotton, October delivery, bought and sold for account of plaintiff.” Tbe following is Moore & Co.’s statement, rendered 25 September, 1905:
“April 27, sold 100 Bspc.$ 7.29
Aug. 28, bo’t 100 Bspc. 11.10
-$1,905
Charges brokerage, buying and selling. 15
Net debit .! . $1,920”
Tbe defendant, in his verified answer, pleaded that tbe above transaction was void, being a contract for “futures.” Upon such plea made, Revisal, sec. 1691, provides that tbe burden is upon tbe plaintiff to prove…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Everingham v. MeighanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. Clayton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Garseed v. Sternberger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- Orvis Bros. v. Holt-Morgan MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Security Life & Annuity Co. v. CostnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Holt v. . WellonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Rodgers, McCabe & Co. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Charles M. Pfeifer & Co. v. IsraelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.