Directoplate Corp. v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
1. The litigation in the District Court involved claims of various patents to Huebner, as follows: First, No. 902,584, November 3, 1908, claims 2 and 3; second, No. 954,290, April 5, 3910, claims 1, 2, and 3; third, No. 954,291, April 5,1910, claims 1, 3, and 10; fourth, No. 1,201,048, October 10,1916, claims 16,17, and 18; fifth, No. 1,377,249, May 19,1921, claims 19 and 54; sixth, No. 1,291,897, January 21, 1919, claim 12; seventh, No. 1,413,406, April 18,1922, claims 10 and 11; eighth, No. 1,452,-078, April 17, 1923, claims 1, .18, and 19.
The decree found validity…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Chicago Patent Corporation v. Genco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Sutherland Paper Co. v. Auburn Carton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Directoplate Corp. v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929