Legal Opinion

Directoplate Corp. v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 1928No. 3801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

1. The litigation in the District Court involved claims of various patents to Huebner, as follows: First, No. 902,584, November 3, 1908, claims 2 and 3; second, No. 954,290, April 5, 3910, claims 1, 2, and 3; third, No. 954,291, April 5,1910, claims 1, 3, and 10; fourth, No. 1,201,048, October 10,1916, claims 16,17, and 18; fifth, No. 1,377,249, May 19,1921, claims 19 and 54; sixth, No. 1,291,897, January 21, 1919, claim 12; seventh, No. 1,413,406, April 18,1922, claims 10 and 11; eighth, No. 1,452,-078, April 17, 1923, claims 1, .18, and 19.

The decree found validity…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Patent Corporation v. Genco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Sutherland Paper Co. v. Auburn Carton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Directoplate Corp. v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API