Legal Opinion

Irvin v. Rushville Cooperative Telephone Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903No. 19,926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Rush Circuit Court; M. E. Eorhner, Special Judge. Action by Arthur 13. Irvin against the Rushville Cooperative Telephone Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, C. J.

— Action by appellant in ten paragraphs, to recover ten penalties of $100 each, under the provisions *525of §§2, 3, Acts 1885, p. 151, §§5529, 5512 Burns 1901. A demurrer was sustained to each of said paragraphs, and there was a final judgment that appellant take nothing by his action, and for costs.

The eleventh paragraph of complaint is of a representa- ! Ac character, and an exhibit of that will therefore sufficiently show what is alleged. Said paragraph, omitting the prayer, is as follows: “That the defendant is an incorporated telephone company, duly incorporated under the laws of the State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Big Creek Stone Co. v. SewardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Boil v. SimmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Mason v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Travelers' Insurance v. Prairie School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Garn v. Board of Election CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Citizens Gas & Coke Utility v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Karr v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API