Legal Opinion
Lytle v. Ames
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 10, 1938No. 44202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
— Since the questions arose on demurrer to the petition, perhaps it is well to set out in full the entire petition as amended. Omitting the formal parts it reads:
“1. The defendant is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa relating to such corporation, and is a corporation of the second class.
“2. The city council of the defendant city, by a resolution of necessity in legal form passed by it on the third day of February, 1930, after proper notice had been given, provided for the paving with concrete of a strip six and one-half feet wide on each side…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- First National Bank v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- MADRID LUMBER COMPANY v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Everds Brothers v. GillespieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Thompson v. L. J. Voldahl, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.